Log in 
New user? Messages in thread: 12.
| Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Jim Roepcke Politics | ||
|
Whiskey Bar: Donald Rumsfeld's Battle With The Truth As much as I've always disliked Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Seth Dillingham Politics | ||
|
On 5/10/04, Jim Roepcke said: >Unfortunately, America's international reputation Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Brian Carnell Politics | ||
|
Jim Roepcke wrote: >Whiskey Bar: Donald Rumsfeld's Battle With The Truth <http://billmon.org/archives/001465.html> Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Jim Roepcke Politics | ||
|
On May 10, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Brian Carnell wrote: > But as Rumsfeld testified, Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Brian Carnell Politics | ||
|
Jim Roepcke wrote: >Still hadn't seen them? What kind of incompetent people does Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Jim Roepcke Politics | ||
|
On May 10, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Brian Carnell wrote: > It wasn't incompetence, it Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Brian Carnell Politics | ||
|
Jim Roepcke wrote: >It's pretty pathetic that >the public and press were better Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Jim Roepcke Politics | ||
|
On May 10, 2004, at 1:50 PM, Brian Carnell wrote: > Rumsfeld had been briefed -- Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/10/2004 - by Philippe Martin Politics | ||
|
But to suggest that they had not taken tough, swift, corrective actions in the Central Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/11/2004 - by Brian Carnell Politics | ||
|
"Haven't you heard of the confidential report by the International Committee of Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/11/2004 - by Jim Roepcke Politics | ||
|
Brian, Your reply is nearly impossible to read via e-mail without ambiguity, because Reply |
| Re: Two face - 5/17/2004 - by Philippe Martin Politics | ||
|
Just a couple of links: New Scientist: Abuse of Iraqis 'well thought through' BBC Reply |
