Log in 
New user? Messages in thread: 21.
| Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
IMHO, any technology-savvy person who has been paying attention to current events Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Ed Leafe Computers-General | ||
|
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:20 PM, Jim Roepcke wrote: > IMHO, any technology-savvy Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 10:31 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Thursday, August Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by James Spahr Computers-General | ||
|
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 01:54 PM, Jim Roepcke wrote: > Definitely. I've Reply |
| RE: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Greg Pierce Computers-General | ||
|
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:14:17 -0400, James Spahr wrote: > So, my Dad use OE on Win Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Greg Pierce wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 Reply |
| RE: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Giles Turnbull Computers-General | ||
|
James wrote: >So, my Dad use OE on Win 98. He complains about various things about Reply |
| The people who should know better - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
A couple of people have responded to my last weblog post saying that "tech-laymen" Reply |
| Re: The people who should know better - 8/21/2003 - by Brian Carnell Computers-General | ||
|
At 06:08 PM 8/21/2003 -0400, Jim wrote: >However, I feel nothing but contempt for Reply |
| Re: The people who should know better - 8/21/2003 - by Brian Carnell Computers-General | ||
|
At 06:08 PM 8/21/2003 -0400, Jim wrote: >This is another thing that bothers me. Reply |
| Re: The people who should know better - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 03:19 PM, Brian Carnell wrote: > Here's the weird Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Bill Kearney Computers-General | ||
|
Uh Jim, it's not Outlook Express that's the problem. It's Outlook and then only Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 04:33 PM, Bill Kearney wrote: > Uh Jim, it's not Reply |
| RE: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Seth Dillingham Computers-General | ||
|
On 8/21/2003, Jim Roepcke said: >Perhaps I should say, people who use unpatched/old Reply |
| Dubya to the rescue! - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
If President Bush would take 1 minute out of his day to tell the world how to fix Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Bill Kearney Computers-General | ||
|
> Perhaps there is an updated version of Outlook Express that doesn't > have the Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/21/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 06:55 PM, Bill Kearney wrote: >> Perhaps there Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/22/2003 - by Bill Kearney Computers-General | ||
|
> That's good to know. Are there any settings that a person should > ensure are Reply |
| RE: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/22/2003 - by Dan Budiac Computers-General | ||
|
Argh! This is not an Outlook issue. Repeat: NOT an Outlook issue! SoBig.F carries Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/22/2003 - by Jim Roepcke Computers-General | ||
|
On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 02:10 PM, Dan Budiac wrote: > Argh! This is not an Reply |
| Re: Outlook Express == Masochism - 8/28/2003 - by Bill Kearney Computers-General | ||
|
> > And don't say it's Windows fault, either. There's no reason this > > couldn't Reply |
