<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Winer&#8217;s MacBook battery life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/archives/2009/10/28/dave-winers-macbook-battery-life.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/archives/2009/10/28/dave-winers-macbook-battery-life.html</link>
	<description>have browser, will travel (est. 1999)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Roepcke</title>
		<link>http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/archives/2009/10/28/dave-winers-macbook-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-4599</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Roepcke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/?p=8252#comment-4599</guid>
		<description>You can conserve power on your MacBook by turning off bluetooth and dimming the screen brightness a touch.

I see on your latest blog you&#039;re using Firefox on your MacBook. I had to give up Firefox on the Mac after using it for years because it used so much CPU all the time! It was making the computer so hot I couldn&#039;t use it on my lap. The fans ran all the time and that was so loud it annoyed me constantly.

I switched to Safari. I miss some of its features, especially &quot;Re-open the last closed tab&quot;, but at least now my computer doesn&#039;t burn me and it&#039;s quiet. And of course that means the battery lasts a lot longer too. It&#039;s too bad that Firefox is so bad on the Mac, because I&#039;d much rather use it than Safari.

One thing you can do if you really want to use Firefox is install the Flashblock add-on. Flash is the worst offender for CPU usage in the browser, it could be it&#039;s the cause of most of the CPU usage. With Flashblock, embedded Flash requires a click to be loaded into a web page.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433

Now that I use Safari I use ClickToFlash which does the same thing.

http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash/

Another Firefox add-on I installed before giving up on Firefox was TooManyTabs. If you have a lot of tabs open in Firefox, it uses a lot of CPU and memory (on all platforms). TooManyTabs lets you keep the tabs visible but doesn&#039;t keep the pages loaded.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9429

Comparing a netbook to a notebook is an apples-to-oranges comparison (no pun intended). Netbooks have low-power components like Atom processors and weak integrated graphics. They&#039;re designed to use much less power, and don&#039;t run nearly as fast. You might not notice the performance difference if you&#039;re just browsing and editing. Netbooks screens are smaller, not as bright, and thus don&#039;t require as much power. So of course your netbook has better battery life.

Saying a MacBook has bad battery life because it doesn&#039;t keep up with your netbook is just silly. It&#039;s like complaining how much gas your SUV guzzled driving to LA compared to your Mini cooper. All I&#039;m saying is if you want to drive your SUV and save some bucks, keep the speed down and don&#039;t run the AC constantly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can conserve power on your MacBook by turning off bluetooth and dimming the screen brightness a touch.</p>
<p>I see on your latest blog you&#8217;re using Firefox on your MacBook. I had to give up Firefox on the Mac after using it for years because it used so much CPU all the time! It was making the computer so hot I couldn&#8217;t use it on my lap. The fans ran all the time and that was so loud it annoyed me constantly.</p>
<p>I switched to Safari. I miss some of its features, especially &#8220;Re-open the last closed tab&#8221;, but at least now my computer doesn&#8217;t burn me and it&#8217;s quiet. And of course that means the battery lasts a lot longer too. It&#8217;s too bad that Firefox is so bad on the Mac, because I&#8217;d much rather use it than Safari.</p>
<p>One thing you can do if you really want to use Firefox is install the Flashblock add-on. Flash is the worst offender for CPU usage in the browser, it could be it&#8217;s the cause of most of the CPU usage. With Flashblock, embedded Flash requires a click to be loaded into a web page.</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433</a></p>
<p>Now that I use Safari I use ClickToFlash which does the same thing.</p>
<p><a href="http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash/" rel="nofollow">http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash/</a></p>
<p>Another Firefox add-on I installed before giving up on Firefox was TooManyTabs. If you have a lot of tabs open in Firefox, it uses a lot of CPU and memory (on all platforms). TooManyTabs lets you keep the tabs visible but doesn&#8217;t keep the pages loaded.</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9429" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9429</a></p>
<p>Comparing a netbook to a notebook is an apples-to-oranges comparison (no pun intended). Netbooks have low-power components like Atom processors and weak integrated graphics. They&#8217;re designed to use much less power, and don&#8217;t run nearly as fast. You might not notice the performance difference if you&#8217;re just browsing and editing. Netbooks screens are smaller, not as bright, and thus don&#8217;t require as much power. So of course your netbook has better battery life.</p>
<p>Saying a MacBook has bad battery life because it doesn&#8217;t keep up with your netbook is just silly. It&#8217;s like complaining how much gas your SUV guzzled driving to LA compared to your Mini cooper. All I&#8217;m saying is if you want to drive your SUV and save some bucks, keep the speed down and don&#8217;t run the AC constantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/archives/2009/10/28/dave-winers-macbook-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-4598</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/?p=8252#comment-4598</guid>
		<description>My netbook is running Windows XP.

I&#039;m really amazed at how ornery you are! 

Give it up Jim, no one cares what either of us thinks. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My netbook is running Windows XP.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really amazed at how ornery you are! </p>
<p>Give it up Jim, no one cares what either of us thinks. <img src='http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Roepcke</title>
		<link>http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/archives/2009/10/28/dave-winers-macbook-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-4597</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Roepcke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/?p=8252#comment-4597</guid>
		<description>Is your netbook running Windows? OPML for Windows doesn&#039;t need to be emulated.

If your netbook is running Mac OS X, the difference in battery life would then likely being attributable to the difference in processors - a low-power Atom processor vs a Core 2 Duo. Of course, in that case you could still have even better battery life by running a native app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your netbook running Windows? OPML for Windows doesn&#8217;t need to be emulated.</p>
<p>If your netbook is running Mac OS X, the difference in battery life would then likely being attributable to the difference in processors &#8211; a low-power Atom processor vs a Core 2 Duo. Of course, in that case you could still have even better battery life by running a native app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Roepcke</title>
		<link>http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/archives/2009/10/28/dave-winers-macbook-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-4596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Roepcke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/?p=8252#comment-4596</guid>
		<description>You want to snipe at Apple for what you say is their flaw, yet your decision to use a power-hungry emulated application at all times is the cause of your problem with the MacBook. It doesn&#039;t matter whether that application is associated with you or anyone else, but its elevates the irony when it is the app you distribute.

GPL or otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want to snipe at Apple for what you say is their flaw, yet your decision to use a power-hungry emulated application at all times is the cause of your problem with the MacBook. It doesn&#8217;t matter whether that application is associated with you or anyone else, but its elevates the irony when it is the app you distribute.</p>
<p>GPL or otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/archives/2009/10/28/dave-winers-macbook-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-4595</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/?p=8252#comment-4595</guid>
		<description>I run exactly the same apps on both the netbook and the Mac.

That said it would be great if we had a universal binary. 

Maybe you could try to be a little less personal about it. You know the app was released under the GPL in 2004, five years ago. If there&#039;s no universal binary, it&#039;s pretty unfair to blame me for it. But you&#039;ve always like to blame me for all the ills of the world right? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run exactly the same apps on both the netbook and the Mac.</p>
<p>That said it would be great if we had a universal binary. </p>
<p>Maybe you could try to be a little less personal about it. You know the app was released under the GPL in 2004, five years ago. If there&#8217;s no universal binary, it&#8217;s pretty unfair to blame me for it. But you&#8217;ve always like to blame me for all the ills of the world right? <img src='http://jim.roepcke.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
