Jim Roepcke's weblog have browser, will travel (est. 1999)

24Jan/02Off

Where to start?

Cyan and BabyI'm proud and relieved to announce that Cheryl delivered, by swift and tidy C-Section, a 10 pound, 22 inch boy!

When the nurse said, "I think he's 10 pounds", I said, "he's big, but 10 pounds? I don't know about that... I'd say 9.5 pounds." Later on we took him over to the weighing area, and ... 10 pounds, .8 ounces. She was right on the button! :-)

When the specialist felt the baby's head this morning, he told Cheryl there was NO chance of her doing a natural birth, given her history. And that was FINE with us!

Everything went great, baby's perfect, beautiful. And he likes to eat! (he's definitely my son ;-) ). Mommy's doing great too, but I had to go later in the evening to take Cyan home. She's been really cranky the last few days, all the nerves bubbling to the top.

I've uploaded pictures from Alex's CF card to my PowerBook, so I'll post a picture later. Right now, I have to call Grandma. :-)

Here's a good one of Cyan holding the baby (we'll announce his name tomorrow (most likely). We have a name picked out pending any sudden flashes of brilliance).

About Jim Roepcke

No description. Please complete your profile.
Comments (9) Trackbacks (0)
  1. What a gorgeous baby! My warmest congratulations to Cheryl, you and Cyan.

    I predict quite a few links to your fantastic news ;-)

    Excellent!

    Duncan

  2. what a beautiful son!!!!hard to believe from the photo that he was just born!!

  3. On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 01:12 AM, Jim Roepcke wrote:

    > I’m proud and relieved to announce that Cheryl delivered, by swift and
    > tidy C-Section, a 10 pound, 22 inch boy!

    Congratulations to you all! I’m very happy and excited for you!

    You know that you’re really in for it now – not only the new baby,
    but having to take care of a wife and another child, too! You do realize
    that you are Cheryl’s total and complete slave for the next few weeks,
    right? ;-)

    ___/
    /
    __/
    /
    ____/
    Ed Leafe
    http://leafe.com/
    http://foxcentral.net

  4. Jim,

    He really is beautiful!! Congratulations!

    As for the names, Logan is nice. Also, I can’t remember if I had the
    conversation with you or with Cheryl but one of you really liked
    Jathaniel.

    Can’t wait to hear what you pick!

    Cheers!
    Jodi

  5. On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 09:30 AM, Jodi Ivy wrote:

    > Jim,
    >
    > He really is beautiful!! Congratulations!
    >
    > As for the names, Logan is nice. Also, I can’t remember if I had the
    > conversation with you or with Cheryl but one of you really liked
    > Jathaniel.

    Sorry, but I’m not wanting any name that doesn’t suit a full grown
    man. :-)

    Jim

  6. On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 10:46 AM, Jim Roepcke wrote:

    > On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 09:30 AM, Jodi Ivy wrote:
    >
    >> Jim,
    >>
    >> He really is beautiful!! Congratulations!
    >>
    >> As for the names, Logan is nice. Also, I can’t remember if I had the
    >> conversation with you or with Cheryl but one of you really liked
    >> Jathaniel.
    >
    > Sorry, but I’m not wanting any name that doesn’t suit a full grown
    > man. :-)
    >
    > Jim

    What is that supposed to mean? I know a man named Jathaniel and the
    name suits him just fine. Frankly, he’s built a lot like you! ;-)

    Jodi

  7. On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 12:46 PM, Jim Roepcke wrote:

    > Sorry, but I’m not wanting any name that doesn’t suit a full grown
    > man. :-)

    You might also want to consider ease of spelling. I’ve gone my
    whole life spelling my last name, as I’m sure you have, too. It is a
    relief not to have to spell ‘Ed’, too, but my sister Geralynn wasn’t so
    lucky.

    My kids are Mike and Dan. Totally not trendy, and totally easy to
    spell.

    Speaking of trendy, how long do you think the current trend of
    using traditional last names as first names is going to last?

    ___/
    /
    __/
    /
    ____/
    Ed Leafe
    http://leafe.com/
    http://foxcentral.net

  8. On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 09:52 AM, Jodi Ivy wrote:

    >> Sorry, but I’m not wanting any name that doesn’t suit a full grown
    >> man. :-)
    >
    > What is that supposed to mean? I know a man named Jathaniel and the
    > name suits him just fine. Frankly, he’s built a lot like you! ;-)

    No offense, it just sounds a bit too feminine for my liking.

    Jim

  9. On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 11:15 AM, Jim Roepcke wrote:

    > On Friday, January 25, 2002, at 09:52 AM, Jodi Ivy wrote:
    >
    >>> Sorry, but I’m not wanting any name that doesn’t suit a full grown
    >>> man. :-)
    >>
    >> What is that supposed to mean? I know a man named Jathaniel and the
    >> name suits him just fine. Frankly, he’s built a lot like you! ;-)
    >
    > No offense, it just sounds a bit too feminine for my liking.
    >
    > Jim

    Interesting. It is pronounced like Daniel or Nathaniel… common male
    names. I can’t think of any “feminine” names that sound remotely like
    either of those. Unless you add -a (like Daniella).

    By the way, I don’t particularly like the name myself, but I think I
    must have shared it with Cheryl, and she liked it. I can see why you
    two have had such a difficult time agreeing on a name. ;-)

    Jodi

Trackbacks are disabled.

Roepcke Computing Solutions

Jim Roepcke specializes in development and mentoring for iPhone and Mac OS X / Cocoa, WebObjects, and Python.

Contact Jim for more information.

Archive Calendar

January 2002
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Blogroll

Saved Searches

Willing to Fail

Jim Roepcke is Willing to Fail

WebObjects book

I co-authored this book

Badges

Proud Member of the Association for Computing Machinery

Listed on BlogShares

Blog Directory - Blogged

Recent tweets

Meta