Time to Redesign?
Message Details
Posted
7/19/2000; 7:09 PM by Jim RoepckeLast Modified
7/20/2000; 12:30 AM by Jim RoepckeIn Response To
(#Top of Thread.)Label
None.Read Count
513
Message Body
I've been thinking about redesigning this site. What do you think, should this site retain its Aqua-look, or should I do something new?
Update: Ed's Weblog has redesigned. I liked the old design, and I like this one too. Note the title -- "Simple is better" -- that's what I've been dreaming of for my new design.
Replies
| Re: Time to Redesign? ( 7/19/2000 by Greg Pierce ) | |
| on 7/19/00 7:17 PM, Jim Roepcke at jim@roepcke.com wrote: > I've been thinking |
| RE: Time to Redesign? ( 7/19/2000 by Sean Elfstrom ) | |
| I kinda like the current design, unless you have something better... |
| RE: Time to Redesign? ( 7/19/2000 by patrick ) | |
| It's a very nice design, but it might not look so good anymore when Aqua is |
| RE: Time to Redesign? ( 7/20/2000 by Ed Bilodeau ) | |
| I wouldn't change much, but dropping the Aqua look would probably freshen things |
| RE: Time to Redesign? ( 7/20/2000 by Duncan Smeed ) | |
| I really like the Aqua design Jim. It works very nicely with MacIE5 but can't |
| RE: Time to Redesign? ( 7/20/2000 by dave rogers ) | |
| I'm chuckling to myself, Jim. During the recent Napster debate I considered |
| RE: Time to Redesign? ( 7/20/2000 by Jim Roepcke ) | |
| I'd really like to hear your comments on this in-progress design . Thanks! |




