Re: Two face
Message Details
Posted
5/10/2004; 3:00 PM by Jim RoepckeLast Modified
5/10/2004; 3:00 PM by Jim RoepckeIn Response To
Re: Two face (#6893)Label
PoliticsRead Count
237
Message Body
On May 10, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Brian Carnell wrote:
> It wasn't incompetence, it was an intentional policy to protect the
> rights of the accused and preserve convictions from claims that
> superiors had interfered with the cases to prejudge the outcomes:
Shouldn't he have been properly briefed by his staff and the Pentagon
before he went into a press conference about it, especially considering
the press had access to this information? It's pretty pathetic that
the public and press were better informed about something than the
Secretary of Defense.
Jim
> It wasn't incompetence, it was an intentional policy to protect the
> rights of the accused and preserve convictions from claims that
> superiors had interfered with the cases to prejudge the outcomes:
Shouldn't he have been properly briefed by his staff and the Pentagon
before he went into a press conference about it, especially considering
the press had access to this information? It's pretty pathetic that
the public and press were better informed about something than the
Secretary of Defense.
Jim
Replies
| Re: Two face ( 5/10/2004 by Brian Carnell ) | |
| Jim Roepcke wrote: >It's pretty pathetic that >the public and press were better |




