RE: A math problem is driving me nuts!
On 5/8/04, Jim Roepcke said:
>It looks to me like it should be ((x2+5x)/(x+1))-3 > 0 instead. Can
>somebody please confirm this or explain how you might get from what I
>got to, to what he got to?
He did it right. Let's do it out the long way to see it.
1. x(x+5) ------ > 3 x+1
Expand it to get:
2. x^2 5x ----- + ----- > 3 x+1 x+1
Subtract 3 from both sides to get:
3. x^2 5x ----- + ----- - 3 > 0 x+1 x+1
To begin the simplification, we need a common denominator, so multiple the 3 by (x+1)/(x+1)
4. x^2 5x 3(x+1) ----- + ----- - ------ > 0 x+1 x+1 x+1
Expand it to get:
5. x^2 5x 3x 3*1 ----- + ----- - ----- - ----- > 0 x+1 x+1 x+1 x+1
Simplify it to get:
6. x^2 2x 3 ----- + ----- - ----- > 0 x+1 x+1 x+1
Which is the same as:
7. x^2 + 2x - 3 -------------- > 0 x+1
Got it?
Man, I'd forgotten how much I loved this stuff!
Seth
| RE: A math problem is driving me nuts! ( 5/8/2004 by Justin ) | |
| You're right Seth, except that the last part should actually be -((3*1)/(x+1)) |
| RE: A math problem is driving me nuts! ( 5/9/2004 by Jim Roepcke ) | |
| Seth showed me how to solve the math problem I was having, as did Dori , privately. |




